Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Evaluating Online Health Information on PIFP: A Cross-Platform Analysis of Content Quality and Readability

Healthcare Analysis

Evaluating Online Health Information on PIFP: A Cross-Platform Analysis of Content Quality and Readability

This study assessed the quality and readability of online health information on Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP) from Google, ChatGPT, and Gemini. Findings reveal that while AI-generated content is more understandable, it lacks practical advice and quality indicators, contrasting with traditional websites that offer more actionability but are harder to read. The results underscore the need for improved, high-quality, and easy-to-understand online patient education materials for complex conditions.

Executive Impact: Key Metrics in Digital Health Information

Understand the critical performance indicators comparing traditional web searches and AI platforms for health information on Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP).

0 Traditional Website Understandability
0 AI Content Understandability
0 Traditional Website Actionability
0 AI Content Actionability

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

55.9% Websites without any JAMA quality benchmarks.

Online Content Evaluation Process

Search Google/AI Platforms
Screen Results for Inclusion
Categorize Websites/AI Content
Assess Readability (FRES/SMOG)
Assess Quality (PEMAT/JAMA)
Compare Platforms & Findings

AI vs. Traditional Online Health Information

Feature AI-Generated Content Traditional Websites
Understandability (PEMAT)
  • Significantly higher (83.31% vs 64.96%)
  • Easier to process key messages
  • Lower scores
  • Often difficult for variable literacy levels
Actionability (PEMAT)
  • Lower scores (11%)
  • Lacks practical advice/guidance
  • Higher scores (25.25%)
  • More actionable steps for patients
Quality (JAMA Benchmarks)
  • Failed to meet any criteria
  • Lack of authorship, attribution, disclosure, currency
  • 44.1% met at least one benchmark
  • Authorship most common, disclosure least common
Readability (FRES/SMOG)
  • Rated 'difficult' (FRES mean 39.55)
  • Requires Grade 11+ reading level (SMOG mean 11.04)
  • Rated 'difficult' (FRES mean 43.88)
  • Requires Grade 10+ reading level (SMOG mean 10.32)

Impact on Patient Education for PIFP

Patients with complex conditions like PIFP often struggle to find reliable and understandable information online. This study highlights that despite AI's improved understandability, the lack of actionable advice means patients may still not know 'what to do next'. The prevalence of commercial affiliations among traditional websites further complicates trust, making it crucial for healthcare providers and content developers to collaborate on creating high-quality, actionable, and readable resources.

76.7% of websites commercially affiliated.

Calculate Your Potential AI Impact

Estimate the efficiency gains and cost savings your enterprise could achieve by optimizing online content delivery and AI integration.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Reclaimed Employee Hours Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A strategic overview of how your enterprise can transition to an AI-optimized content strategy, enhancing quality and accessibility.

Phase 1: Assessment & Strategy (1-2 Months)

Conduct a comprehensive audit of existing online content, identify gaps in quality and readability, and define clear objectives for AI integration in patient education materials.

Phase 2: Platform Selection & Pilot (2-3 Months)

Evaluate and select AI platforms capable of generating understandable and actionable content. Initiate a pilot program with a subset of content to test effectiveness and gather feedback.

Phase 3: Content Development & Integration (3-6 Months)

Scale AI content generation, focusing on improving readability and integrating quality benchmarks. Train content creators and medical professionals on AI tools and best practices.

Phase 4: Monitoring & Iteration (Ongoing)

Continuously monitor AI-generated content for accuracy, quality, and user engagement. Implement feedback loops for iterative improvements, ensuring long-term success and compliance.

Ready to Transform Your Digital Health Content?

Leverage AI to provide patients with high-quality, readable, and actionable health information. Book a free consultation to discuss a tailored strategy for your enterprise.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking