Environmental Evidence Synthesis
Advocating for trust in and trustworthy AI to transform evidence synthesis
This paper highlights the critical juncture in global evidence ecosystems, driven by compounding crises and the rapid rise of AI. It argues that while AI offers transformative potential for evidence synthesis—making it faster, cheaper, and more reliable—its successful integration hinges on building both trustworthy AI systems and user trust in these systems. The current lack of consensus on what constitutes 'trustworthy AI' and the absence of robust evaluation frameworks hinder widespread adoption. The paper calls for philanthropic investment in trustworthy AI, robust evaluations of trust, and a cultural shift in the evidence community to balance innovation with ethical implementation. It emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and meaningful user engagement to overcome skepticism and ensure AI genuinely enhances evidence-based decision-making for global challenges.
Executive Impact & Key Metrics
AI-powered evidence synthesis offers unprecedented opportunities for streamlining research, improving policy responsiveness, and addressing global challenges like climate change and pandemics. By reducing the time and cost associated with synthesizing vast bodies of scientific literature, AI can accelerate the delivery of high-quality, robust, and up-to-date evidence to decision-makers. This translates into more agile policy formulation, better resource allocation, and ultimately, saving lives and enhancing livelihoods globally. However, without a strong focus on trustworthiness and trust, these benefits risk being undermined by ethical concerns, biases, and user reluctance.
0%
Potential reduction in evidence synthesis time
0%
Increase in policy responsiveness with AI-driven insights
0%
Improvement in evidence accessibility and utilization
0%
User skepticism decrease with transparent AI
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
47
AI-driven evidence tracking for dynamic fields (e.g., COVID-19, climate policy)
Living Systematic Reviews (LSRs) with AI
AI significantly enhances the feasibility and maintenance of Living Systematic Reviews (LSRs), which are continually updated to incorporate new evidence. LSRs are crucial for rapidly evolving evidence bases like COVID-19 and climate change, ensuring decision-makers have the most current information. While LSRs face barriers such as setup time and resource intensity, AI can mitigate these challenges, making them more accessible and sustainable. This proactive approach ensures that policy is always informed by the latest, high-quality research findings, leading to more responsive and effective interventions. Strong signals from the community and funder support present valuable opportunities to advocate for trustworthy AI.
Enterprise Process Flow
Lack of Consensus on Trustworthy AI
→
Absence of Robust Evaluation
→
User Skepticism & Adoption Divide
→
Ethical Concerns & Bias
→
Limited Explainability (Black Box)
→
Hindered Transformational Progress
61
AI systems can perpetuate existing biases, requiring careful oversight
| Trustworthy AI (Intrinsic Property) | Trust in AI (User Perception) |
|---|---|
|
|
Funder's Role in Shaping Trustworthy AI
Philanthropic funders have a critical role in fostering a trustworthy AI ecosystem. Instead of solely focusing on innovation for quick technological wins, funders should prioritize investments in: 1. Robust Evaluation: Support empirical evaluations of AI tools for evidence synthesis. 2. Open Access: Incentivize open-access AI tools and systems. 3. Transdisciplinary Methods: Encourage participatory design and co-development with diverse stakeholders. 4. Contextual Integration: Invest in purpose-built AI policy instruments that adapt to specific evidence demands. By doing so, funders can help bridge the gap between AI potential and widespread, trustworthy implementation, ensuring AI serves global needs effectively and ethically.
Calculate Your Potential AI Impact
Estimate the efficiency gains and cost savings your enterprise could achieve by integrating AI into evidence synthesis workflows.
Your AI Implementation Roadmap
A strategic approach to integrating trustworthy AI into your evidence synthesis capabilities.
Phase 1: Needs Assessment & Pilot
Identify specific evidence synthesis workflows ripe for AI integration. Conduct small-scale pilots with select AI tools, focusing on tasks like abstract screening. Gather initial feedback on usability and perceived trustworthiness.
Phase 2: Trustworthiness Framework Development
Collaborate with AI developers, ethicists, and evidence users to establish a clear, consensus-based framework for trustworthy AI in evidence synthesis. Incorporate principles of transparency, accountability, and fairness.
Phase 3: Scaled Integration & Training
Gradually integrate AI tools into broader evidence synthesis workflows, supported by comprehensive training for users. Emphasize human-in-the-loop approaches to build confidence and refine AI performance. Prioritize transparent reporting of AI outputs.
Phase 4: Continuous Evaluation & Iteration
Implement ongoing, robust evaluation mechanisms for AI systems, assessing both trustworthiness and user trust. Regularly update AI models and guidelines based on performance data and evolving ethical considerations, ensuring long-term sustainability and impact.
Ready to Transform Your Evidence Synthesis?
Unlock the full potential of AI for evidence synthesis in your organization. Schedule a free consultation to discover how a bespoke, trustworthy AI strategy can transform your evidence-based decision-making, ensuring faster, cheaper, and more reliable insights.
Ready to Get Started?
Book Your Free Consultation.
Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!
Lets Discuss Your Needs
Select a Date
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat