Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Enter, Exit, Page Fault, Leak: Testing Isolation Boundaries for Microarchitectural Leaks

Enterprise AI Analysis

Advanced Microarchitectural Security Analysis

Proactive Vulnerability Detection in Modern CPUs

Executive Impact: Fortifying Digital Trust

Understanding microarchitectural leaks is crucial for enterprise security. Our analysis of 'Enter, Exit, Page Fault, Leak+' reveals actionable insights for robust system design and compliance.

4 New Leak Discoveries
88+ Machine-Days Tested
20+ Billion Hardware Measurements

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Methodology
Key Findings
Mitigation & Performance

Systematic Testing Methodology

The core of our approach relies on Model-based Relational Testing (MRT) extended for cross-domain leakage. This systematic process ensures comprehensive vulnerability detection.

Generate Test Cases
Execute on Hardware
Execute on Model
Compare Leakage
Report Violations

MRT vs. Traditional Testing

MRT offers significant advantages over traditional reactive patching and theoretical reasoning for microarchitectural security.

Feature MRT Approach Traditional Methods
Scope
  • Cross-domain isolation
  • Detects new vulnerabilities
  • Single domain
  • Confirms known attacks
Automation
  • Automated test case generation
  • Statistical analysis
  • Manual PoC verification
  • Theoretical reasoning
Efficiency
  • Adaptive sample sizing
  • High throughput
  • Laborious, error-prone
  • Fragmented solutions

Four Novel Cross-Domain Leaks Detected

4 NEW LEAKS IDENTIFIED

Our comprehensive testing campaign identified critical, previously unknown microarchitectural vulnerabilities across diverse CPU architectures.

Cross-VM Leakage on AMD Zen 4 (CVE-2024-36357)

A novel microarchitectural effect allows an attacker VM to infer cached memory bits from another VM. This vulnerability highlights the need for constant vigilance in cloud environments.

Summary: An attacker VM can infer any bit from the memory of another VM, provided the victim VM has previously accessed it. This could allow reading arbitrary memory ranges. This leak has been assigned CVE-2024-36357 with potential high security impact.

Kernel-to-User Leakage on AMD Zen 4 (CVE-2024-36350)

A user process can observe recently-stored values from kernel mode, enabling extraction of privileged data. This finding underscores the challenges in protecting kernel boundaries.

Summary: A user-level gadget demonstrates timing dependency on data stored in kernel mode, allowing an unprivileged attacker to extract privileged data. This is assigned CVE-2024-36350 with moderate-to-high impact.

Rogue Read of RDTSCP-AUX (CVE-2024-36349)

Speculative reading of the auxiliary timestamp counter register, even when architecturally disabled, affects Intel and AMD CPUs, contradicting vendor claims.

Summary: Speculative execution allows user processes to read the auxiliary timestamp counter (RDTSCP AUX) even when disabled, affecting Intel and AMD CPUs. This contradicts AMD's claims and is assigned CVE-2024-36349. Impact is considered low.

High-Performance Testing: 800-4500 Measurements/Sec

~4500 MEASUREMENTS/SEC

Our adaptive sample sizing and optimized execution environment enable rapid detection of vulnerabilities.

Mitigation Effectiveness Confirmed

Our tool successfully validated the effectiveness of known patches for MDS, Foreshadow, DSS, and Meltdown, and also identified cases of ineffective patches.

Vulnerability Patch Tested Effectiveness
MDS
  • VERW (Effective)
  • L1D_FLUSH_CMD (Effective)
  • WBINVD (Ineffective)
Foreshadow
  • L1D_FLUSH_CMD (Effective)
  • WBINVD (Ineffective)
DSS
  • Linux dummy division (Effective)
  • Old Linux patch (Ineffective)
Meltdown
  • KPTI + VERW (Effective)
  • KPTI alone (Ineffective for some variants)

Calculate Your Enterprise's AI Security ROI

Estimate the potential cost savings and efficiency gains by proactively addressing microarchitectural vulnerabilities with our AI-driven security analysis.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your Path to Proactive Security Validation

Our phased approach ensures a smooth and effective integration of advanced microarchitectural security testing into your development lifecycle.

Initial Assessment & Scope Definition

Comprehensive analysis of existing systems and identification of critical isolation boundaries.

Custom Test Case Generation

Development of tailored test templates and random instruction pools specific to your CPU architectures.

Multi-Domain Execution & Data Collection

High-throughput execution of tests in a sandboxed environment, collecting hardware traces across domains.

Model-Based Leakage Analysis

Automated comparison against abstract models to identify unexpected information leaks and validate mitigations.

Actionable Insights & Mitigation Strategy

Detailed reports on discovered vulnerabilities, proposed fixes, and proactive security validation roadmap.

Ready to Fortify Your Enterprise's AI Security?

Transition from reactive patching to proactive security validation. Our experts are ready to help.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking