Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Evaluation of Large Language Models within GenAI in Qualitative Research

Enterprise AI Analysis

Evaluation of Large Language Models within GenAI in Qualitative Research

This study rigorously evaluated GPT-40's performance in thematic and sentiment analysis of qualitative data from a study on COVID-19's impact on adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Kenya. While GenAI adequately identified major themes, its ability to select supportive quotes was low and inconsistent, often marred by hallucinations and cultural misunderstandings. Sentiment analysis also showed variable reliability, performing worse with male transcripts due to linguistic complexities. The findings suggest GenAI can aid in initial theme identification but is not yet sophisticated enough for rigorous qualitative research without extensive human oversight.

Executive Impact Summary

0.0 Average Theme Consistency (BERT F1 Score)
0 AGYW Quotes Supporting Themes (%)
0 Male Quotes Supporting Themes (%)
0 Negative Sentiments Identified in AGYW (%)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Thematic Analysis Evaluation

Explores how GenAI's identified themes compared to human-coded themes, focusing on accuracy, depth, and the identification of sub-themes. This section also covers the critical issue of quote selection quality and instances of hallucination.

100% Agreement on Theme Description Clarity
Aspect Human Analysis (Human-led) GenAI Analysis (GPT-40)
Theme Identification
  • Comprehensive, context-aware, refined iteratively
  • Identified relevant sub-themes, but some not at 'theme' level
Quote Selection
  • Highly accurate and contextually relevant
  • Low and variable consistency; prone to hallucination
Cultural Nuance
  • Deep understanding of local context, language subtleties
  • Identified biases related to lack of cultural understanding
Reflexivity
  • Integral, self-reflection on biases
  • Identified training data biases, Western-centric perspective

Sentiment Analysis Insights

Delves into the quantitative and qualitative sentiment analysis capabilities of GenAI, assessing its performance across different emotional categories for both AGYW and community male transcripts.

50% AGYW Transcripts Classified as Negative Sentiment

Challenge: Male Transcript Complexity

GenAI performed less reliably in sentiment analysis of male transcripts. This was attributed to lengthier, indirect speech patterns, frequent use of euphemisms, and less accurate grammar compared to AGYW transcripts, leading to misinterpretation. Solution: Future models require advanced linguistic processing and deeper contextual understanding for diverse speech patterns.

Bias Identification & Mitigation

Examines the biases identified by GenAI itself during the analysis process, including those related to training data, cultural context, and representation, and discusses potential mitigation strategies.

Enterprise Process Flow

Training Data Bias
Lack of Cultural Understanding
Confirmation Bias
Misinterpretation of Nuances
Overgeneralization
Bias Type GenAI Identified Biases Mitigation Strategies (Human-led)
Selection Bias
  • Representativeness of study sample/transcripts, quote selection bias
  • Balanced and representative training data, human oversight
Information Bias
  • Language and context bias, interpretation bias, cultural bias (Western-centric)
  • Continuous learning, local knowledge integration, transparency
Ethical/Moral Bias
  • Influenced by ethical guidelines embedded in training data (may not align with local culture)
  • Human judgment, alignment with local cultural standards

Calculate Your Potential Research Efficiency Gain

Estimate the time and cost savings your organization could achieve by integrating AI-powered qualitative analysis into your research workflows. Adjust the parameters to see your potential ROI.

Annual Cost Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A strategic phased approach to integrate GenAI into your qualitative research, ensuring successful adoption and maximum benefit.

Phase 1: Pilot & Validation

Start with a small, contained qualitative project. Integrate GenAI for initial theme generation and sentiment analysis. Rigorously compare AI outputs with human coding, focusing on hallucination detection and quote accuracy. Establish a human oversight framework.

Phase 2: Customization & Refinement

Based on pilot findings, customize GenAI models with domain-specific datasets (e.g., local cultural context, specific health terminology) to reduce biases and improve contextual understanding. Train AI on diverse linguistic patterns, especially for varied participant groups.

Phase 3: Scaled Integration & Continuous Learning

Implement GenAI across broader qualitative research workflows. Develop mechanisms for ongoing human feedback loops to continuously improve AI performance. Leverage AI for rapid appraisals, keyword identification, and bias checks, augmenting human researchers rather than replacing them.

Ready to Transform Your Research with AI?

Unlock deeper insights and accelerate your qualitative research with our tailored GenAI solutions. Our experts are ready to help you navigate the complexities and maximize your impact.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking