Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: FT-ARM: Fine-Tuned Agentic Reflection Multimodal Language Model for Pressure Ulcer Severity Classification with Reasoning

Enterprise AI Analysis

FT-ARM: Fine-Tuned Agentic Reflection Multimodal Language Model for Pressure Ulcer Severity Classification with Reasoning

Pressure Ulcers (PUs) are a prevalent and serious healthcare concern. To guide appropriate treatment, accurate categorization of PU severity into one of four categories (I - IV) is required. However, as severity categories often have subtle and subjective visual distinctions, manual staging is challenging and prone to variability across clinicians, necessitating automated solutions. Prior Al-driven approaches explored Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Vision Transformers (ViT), which yielded promising image classification results but their predictions had limited interpretability. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs), which integrate vision and language understanding, are an emerging paradigm for contextualized and explainable image classification. We present FT-ARM (Fine-Tuned Agentic Reflection Multimodal model), which combines a fine-tuned MLLM with an agentic self-reflection mechanism to classify pressure ulcer image severity classification, while also providing rich rationale (reasoning) and context for its classifications. Inspired by diagnostic reassessments by human clinicians, FT-ARM's self-reflection strategy, performs iterative self-refinement of its initial predictions by reasoning over visual features and encoded clinical knowledge (via natural language understanding of clinical notes) to improve classification accuracy and consistency. In experiments on the publicly available Pressure Injury Image Dataset (PIID), our fine-tuned model-FT-ARM with LLaMA 3.2 90B as backbone-achieved an accuracy of 85% in classifying pressure ulcer stages I-IV, outperforming prior CNN-based models (by +4%). It is also instructive to note that prior work utilizing CNN or ViT models, typically reported model performance in offline evaluations, which would likely degrade in live deployments. In contrast, FT-ARM is designed for and evaluated in a live inference scenario that reflect real-time deployment conditions, enhancing its potential for clinical application. Beyond predictive performance, FT-ARM generates clinically grounded natural language explanations (reasons) for each prediction, offering interpretability aligned with expert reasoning. By combining fine-tuning with reflective reasoning on multimodal inputs, FT-ARM advances the reliability, transparency, and clinical utility of automated wound assessment systems-addressing a critical need for consistent and explainable pressure ulcer staging to support improved patient care.

Keywords: Pressure Ulcers, Deep Learning, Multimodal Large Language Model, Fine-Tuning, Agentic Reflection

Executive Impact

Our in-depth analysis of the paper highlights key performance indicators and strategic advantages for enterprise adoption.

0 Classification Accuracy
0 Performance Gain over CNNs
0 Balanced F1-Score

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Computing Methodologies
Applied Computing

This section explores the core AI techniques and models developed or applied in the paper, including neural networks, natural language generation, and visual inspection methods.

Enterprise Process Flow

Wound Image + Clinical Note + Prompt
Generator LLM (Initial Prediction + Rationale)
Critique LLM (Feedback)
Generator LLM (Revised Prediction)
Final Output (Stage Classification + Rationale)

The FT-ARM model integrates a fine-tuned Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) with an agentic self-reflection mechanism. This iterative process, inspired by human diagnostic reassessments, refines initial predictions to improve accuracy and consistency in pressure ulcer staging.

Achieving 85.2% Accuracy in Pressure Ulcer Staging

85.2% Classification Accuracy

FT-ARM achieved an impressive 85.2% accuracy on the Pressure Injury Image Dataset (PIID) for classifying pressure ulcer stages I-IV. This significantly outperforms prior CNN-based models and demonstrates the effectiveness of fine-tuning and agentic reflection for complex medical image tasks.

FT-ARM vs. Baseline Models: Performance Comparison

Feature/Model FT-ARM (LLaMA 90B) Top CNN (ResNeXt50+wFPN) Top ViT (Swin Transformer-tiny) GPT-4o (CoT)
Accuracy (%) 85.2 81.5 75.5 70.0
F1-Score 0.85 0.811 NA 0.71
Fine-Tuning Capability Yes N/A N/A No (Limited API FT)
Agentic Reflection Yes No No No
Explainable Rationale Yes No No Yes (via CoT)
Live Inference Design Yes No (Offline Eval) No (Offline Eval) Yes

FT-ARM's specialized design, combining fine-tuning and agentic reflection, allows it to outperform generic MLLMs and traditional computer vision models. It delivers superior accuracy and interpretability crucial for clinical applications.

This category covers the practical applications of computing, focusing on health informatics and how the developed AI system addresses real-world challenges in medical settings.

From Stage IV to Stage III: The Power of Self-Critique

The agentic reflection mechanism allows FT-ARM to iteratively refine its predictions, much like a human clinician. In one notable case, the model initially misclassified a pressure ulcer, but self-critique led to a corrected, clinically precise diagnosis.

  • Initial Prediction (Generator LLM): Stage IV. Reason: Presence of yellow slough and apparent tissue depth suggests full-thickness loss with possible exposure of underlying structures.
  • Critique (Critique LLM): Rebuttal: No visible bone, tendon, or muscle is exposed. The yellow slough and depth are consistent with Stage III, not Stage IV.
  • Revised Prediction (Generator LLM): Stage III. Reason: Full-thickness skin loss with slough but no evidence of exposed deeper structures confirms Stage III.

This example highlights how FT-ARM’s iterative self-correction enhances diagnostic precision, especially in ambiguous cases, fostering greater reliability and clinical trust.

Projected ROI Calculator

Estimate your potential annual savings and reclaimed hours by integrating advanced AI into your enterprise workflows.

Projected Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A phased approach to integrate FT-ARM and similar AI solutions into your existing enterprise architecture, ensuring seamless adoption and maximum impact.

Discovery & Strategy

Initial consultation to understand your specific needs, data landscape, and define clear objectives for AI integration. Identify key stakeholders and potential use cases.

Data Preparation & Fine-Tuning

Assist with data curation, annotation, and pre-processing. Fine-tune FT-ARM with your domain-specific datasets using LoRA for optimal performance and efficiency.

Integration & Deployment

Seamlessly integrate the FT-ARM model into your existing clinical systems or custom applications. Implement robust APIs and ensure secure, scalable deployment.

Monitoring & Optimization

Continuous monitoring of model performance, accuracy, and interpretability in live environments. Iterate and optimize for sustained value and adapt to evolving clinical needs.

Training & Support

Provide comprehensive training for your clinical and technical teams on using and managing the AI system. Offer ongoing support and maintenance to ensure long-term success.

Ready to Transform Your Operations?

Our team of AI experts is ready to discuss how these advancements can be tailored to your enterprise. Book a free consultation today.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking