Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Integration of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice: A Review of Market-Available Tools for Clinical Practice

AI in Gastroenterology

Integration of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice: A Review of Market-Available Tools for Clinical Practice

This review analyzes the integration of AI into capsule endoscopy, focusing on market-available systems for small bowel evaluation. It highlights AI's role in reducing reading times and enhancing lesion detection, particularly for suspected small bowel bleeding and Crohn's disease. While current AI tools improve efficiency and diagnostic yield, they still have limitations in detection rates and require expert review. Future advancements aim to improve detection, standardize algorithms, and explore new applications like pan-enteric evaluation and real-time AI integration, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Quantifying AI's Impact in Endoscopy

AI-enhanced capsule endoscopy offers tangible benefits across key operational metrics. See the improvements in efficiency and diagnostic precision.

0 Reading Time Reduction
0 Diagnostic Yield Increase
0 AI Detection Sensitivity

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Small Bowel Bleeding
Crohn's Disease
General Workflow & Future

Small Bowel Bleeding

AI-powered capsule endoscopy significantly reduces reading times and improves lesion detection for suspected small bowel bleeding (SSBB). While systems like TOP100 and SmartScan offer high sensitivity, complete reliance is not yet possible due to remaining undetected lesions and varying performance across different bowel preparation qualities. Expert review remains crucial to ensure accurate diagnosis and therapeutic intervention planning. Future developments aim to enhance detection rates and standardize algorithms for broader clinical adoption.

1.9 Average reading time with AI (PillCam™ SB3)

AI System Performance Comparison for SSBB

AI System Key Advantages Limitations
PillCam™ SB3 (TOP100)
  • Reduced reading time (1.9 min)
  • Limited diagnostic accuracy (82.9% per-lesion), poor bowel prep limitations
Mirocam® (Express View)
  • Reduced reading time (13 min)
  • No significant sensitivity difference vs SR (82.2% vs 93.3%)
OMOM® HD (SmartScan)
  • High sensitivity (98.1%) & reduced reading time (2.3 min)
  • Missed certain lesions, timing discrepancies for landmarks
Navicam® SB (ProScan)
  • Increased diagnostic yield (11.3%) & reduced reading time (3 min)
  • No superiority over SR for high-risk lesions, 6.6% miss rate

Crohn's Disease

AI applications in capsule endoscopy for Crohn's Disease (CD) are emerging, with promising results for ulcer and erosion detection. CNN-based systems like OMOM® SmartScan have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. AI-assisted Lewis Score evaluation shows strong correlation with conventional methods, suggesting its potential as an adjunct tool. However, challenges remain in assessing disease extent across different bowel segments and fully replacing expert review.

Early findings with traditional machine learning models, such as TOP100, suggested that aphthae and ulcerations may be more challenging for AI to detect compared to bleeding lesions, likely due to the subtle color differences between normal mucosa and these lesion types. This limitation affects the diagnostic performance of TOP100 in this clinical setting. However, a retrospective single-center study by Freitas et al. involving 115 patients evaluated the use of TOP100 for assessing small bowel CD severity. The study found that AI-assisted Lewis Score (LS) evaluation using TOP100-selected frames strongly correlated with conventional full-frame video review (k=0.83, p<0.001), with even higher agreement in cases of moderate-to-severe disease activity (k=0.92, p<0.001) [41]. Despite these promising results, the study concluded that while full-video review remains the gold standard, TOP100 may serve as a valuable adjunct tool for LS evaluation.

98.6 OMOM® SmartScan for ulcer/erosion detection

General Workflow & Future

The integration of AI into capsule endoscopy streamlines workflow by reducing reading times and aiding lesion characterization. However, challenges persist regarding standardization, data quality, and clinical validation. Ethical considerations, including bias and transparency, are crucial. Future innovations include real-time AI in capsules, self-propelled robotic devices, and multimodal data fusion, aiming for fully autonomous lesion identification and improved patient outcomes.

Enterprise AI-Assisted CE Workflow

Image Acquisition
AI Preprocessing
Feature Extraction (CADe/CADx)
Marked / Prioritized Frames
Clinician Review
Significant Findings Confirmation

Despite high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy, AI still exhibits suboptimal negative predictive values and miss rates, meaning it cannot yet fully replace expert review. A proposed workflow could involve AI-based early screening, where AI suggests potential lesions that may require therapeutic intervention, followed by a thorough review by an expert endoscopist for final interpretation. In this context, AI functions as a preliminary triage tool, significantly reducing the reading process while supporting, rather than replacing, expert diagnosis.

Estimate Your AI-Driven Efficiency Gains

Calculate the potential annual savings and hours reclaimed by integrating AI into your enterprise's diagnostic processes. Adjust parameters to see the impact.

Annual Cost Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Integration Roadmap

A structured approach ensures successful adoption and maximum return on investment for AI-enhanced diagnostics.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy

Initial consultation, assessment of current diagnostic workflows, identification of key integration points for AI-enhanced capsule endoscopy, and development of a tailored AI strategy.

Phase 2: System Integration & Training

Deployment of AI-powered capsule endoscopy software, integration with existing PACS/HIS, and comprehensive training for medical staff on new AI tools and optimized workflows.

Phase 3: Pilot & Validation

Conducting pilot studies with AI-assisted CE, collecting performance data, validating diagnostic accuracy against human experts, and fine-tuning AI parameters for optimal results.

Phase 4: Scaled Rollout & Monitoring

Full-scale implementation across departments, continuous monitoring of AI performance, periodic updates, and ongoing support to ensure sustained efficiency and diagnostic excellence.

Ready to Transform Your Diagnostic Workflow?

Unlock the full potential of AI in capsule endoscopy to enhance accuracy, reduce reading times, and improve patient outcomes. Our experts are ready to guide you.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking